Adam Krims' Rap music and the poetics of identity was a very insightful book. He provides new ways of analyzing hip hop and more specifically, rap; contests the notions of music theory; emphasizes the importance of cross-discipline analysis involving the humanities, communications, media studies and other fields; highlights the importance of close reading of music; promotes the conduct of music analysis involving cultural and social implications; and creates new terminology and systems of analyzing different than Western European modes of analysis.
Krims outlines new perspectives on previous case studies of rap music and in general, on musicology as a whole. His new-age school of thought when it comes to analysis of pop-culture music is well-needed to off-set the out-dated modes. Rap music was not designed so that it could be analyzed by a European-taught scholar, neither was folk music, but this European school has adapted a method that complies with the musical demands of folk music more so than it does with rap music. Because of technology, the creation of music no longer requires scores or musical notation. It can all be done electronically with synthesizers and sequences. Since the form of notation has changed we must also change our way of analyzing. Krims provides systems of analysis within his book, but also heeds the reader that his way is only a preliminary way and is not the definitive form of analysis.
I appreciate his initial effort but, maybe due to my classical training, find for example, his Figure 2.1 (pg 59) that analyzes KRS-One's "MCs Act Like They Don't Know" slightly confusing at first. The division of the beat-classes as 0-3 rather than the typical 1-4 (and similarly the subdivision of the beat) is hard to adjust to when the majority of music and even a lot of pop-culture music is counted from 1-4. Unlike musical notation where the words are directly under the notes, the separation of the syllables marked by an 'x' and the lyrics written below made it difficult to read both at the same time. Obviously this is only a minor detail that I am picking upon, but when showing the figure to both music readers and non-music readers, they all had difficulty discerning how to read the figure. Krims figure however insinuates a valuable point, that since (for the most part) rap is not expressed through tone-distinguishable notes, there is no need to represent it on a musical staff. The rhythm is more significant and needs be signified in a manner that saves space yet gets the point across. I did on the other hand get used to the layering graph and details of cells figures. They did require some work to understand, but so does any new way of interpretation. I do feel though that Krims system needs some refining, but believe he is on the right track.
Krims musical analysis is only one valuable aspect of the book. His studies on Ice Cube's "The Nigga Yah Love to Hate" and geographic-specific hip hop of the Netherlands and Alberta highlight the importance rap music has in forming identities for the artist and audience alike. His in-depth analysis of Ice Cube's song solidifies the argument that rap music is a viable form of art and expression with connotations and meanings as deep as any other art form. One might even call the genre the Shakespeare of our day. This notion of rap and musical poetics, as Krims outlines, is very much associated with cultural identity. The notion of culture being not a static past, but rather an ongoing process of revision and creation in the present and future is something I very much respond with. Thus identity is in no way static, but something that is ever-changing due to the flux within culture.
In regards to my research, I am not completely 100% sold on notating rhythms as outlined by Krims. However, I may adapt his method to suit my needs. Likewise, whether or not I need layering graphs or details of cells is dependent upon each song and whether or not the analysis of the layers contributes to a better understanding of the song. I find his use of specific terms, such as how to categorize the sub-genres within rap, very useful. His perspectives on identity and rap music are intriguing and I will include this in my approach such as questioning the relationship between the artists and the music he/she creates; whether they may identify with it personally; and how the music influences the individual and vice versa.
One thing I wonder is how would Krims book fair with an individual that does not have musical training? Would they understand his modes of analysis much easier because they do not have preconceived notions of how to analyze? Or would they be similarly puzzled? I need to consider these questions for myself while compiling my research and writing. Do I gear it towards a musically-inclined audience or do I expect the audience to know as little as possible? For one thing, I know that a general audience will have little knowledge about the Baha'i Faith and rap music, so initial presentations/papers would be geared in a way that would define terms both religious and musical. But a presentation at a Baha'i conference would require little background info on the religion, but more emphasis would be needed on musical terms.